Publication Invitation / Press release of The Book-Wrong Gender biased Laws
Posted by 498A_Crusader on February 14, 2008
“Wrong Gender biased Laws”
(NEW DELHI) The Gender Human Rights Society is publishing this extraordinary book, Wrong Gender biased Laws which is a compilation of various press releases, detailed booklet(s) about the proposed Sexual harassment in the Workplace law of 2007, Domestic violence law, Dowry law/ IPC 498a survival guide, mens human rights demands, etc.
This book is expected to provide some much needed weapons , to forces fighting against radical feminists and to those fighting against the unscrupulous wives and their parents who misuse the gender biased laws. It also attempts to explain why the current gender biased laws as well as the new ones proposed by the radical feminists are a recipe for social disaster. Whether they achieve their goal will be hotly contested by the readers. But one thing is sure: Their endeavor is long overdue.
Date and Place:
16th February 2008 (Saturday), at Press club of India (Delhi). 1 Raisana Road, adjacent to Metro Station of Central Secretariat. Phone: 23719844, 23736248 (near Hotel Le Meridian).
Program:
3:15 PM to 5:15 PM – the Speakers will be given 10 minutes each, followed by some free time to interact with those present, including the press and media.
5:15 PM to 5:30 PM – Gender Human Rights Society representatives will talk about the book.
5:30 PM to 6:00 PM – Tea
In between the speeches, representatives of following organizations will be available for an informal interaction and written material:
www.savefamily.org (Delhi) and www.498a.org (USA)
Inauguration by Mrs. Saroj Rani , Secretary MASI (Mothers and sisters initiative), a women members only organization also working towards obtaining justice for men.
Mr. Swarup Sarkar, Coordinator of Save Family Foundation (NGO) www.savefamily.org says” 35 pages 498a survival guide, is a must read for those facing matrimonial conflict, and dowry cases.”
Sandeep Bhartia, President of the Gender Human Rights Society says “Law proposals in pipeline have an aim of getting press in control of radical feminists by Law. Another aim is to increase money and jobs reserved for women rights activists. This leads to distorted propaganda for earning money ” & “Any Law that through old men out of house even if it is called Domestic Violence Law from Oct 2006, is wrong and Supreme court Judgment of Batra Vs Batra, that say, the Domestic violence act can be applied to only those houses, that the husband owns or has rented or has some ancestral share, is correct .
Dr. Anupama Secretary www.498a.org. A NRI dominated organization says “Good compilation of research articles”
Supported by:
- Save Family Foundation (SFF), Delhi www.savefamily.org: 9810611534/9911119113
- Rakshak , USA www.498a.org: 9810452017
- Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF), Bangalore www.saveindianfamily.org: 0934285323538/9845143724
- MyNation, Dubai/Kuwait http://mynation.net : 00965-3869295
- Protect Indian Family (PIF), Mumbai www.protectindianfamily.org: 09869323538/ 9821414336
- Bharat Bachoo Sangthan, Kolkata : 09830151555
- Sahana, Hydrabad www.sahanaindia.org :09848280354/09908578457
- Protect men’s Right, Kerala: 09387052990/0484230478
- Men Cell, Delhi www.mancell.i8.com : 9810170681/9868142608
- Save Innocent Mother and Sister (SIMS) , Bangalore:09342041382
- Men Rights Protection, Mumbai: 9892668560
- Asha Kiran, Bangalore www.asha-kiran.org: 080-65334135
- Kutumb Rakshna Vedike: 09886934853
- Protect Men’s Rights, Orissa: 0943708337
- Pati Pariwar Kalyan Samiti, Lucknow : 09839097522
- www.siftimes.com
Gender Human Rights Society (Regd. NGO) www.ghrs.in
Contact:
President:Sandeep Bhartia sandeep.bhartia@gmail.com
Phone: 9971117829
Secretary: Niladri Das niladri_shekhar_das_in@yahoo.co.in
Phone: 9811052770
BOOK INFORMATION: Wrong Gender biased Laws , 151 A4 size pages
Published by: Gender Human Rights Society (Regd.) NGO www.ghrs.in
Price:. Rupees 51 for quantities less then 10.
Truth About Dowry Law and Its Misuse
Violence at Home A Truth for The Indian Husband
Narcissists Modern Indian Woman?
Indias Legal Tools of Extortion
Reconciliation
TRUE Colour of Media and Women
My Vision My Dream
The Indian GenderBiased Domestic Violence Act
Indian Mens Legal Torture
PRE NUPITAL CONTRACT
Think before get marry Indian Women
abc said
Black era of India civilisation under 498a misuse is occuring. Whether God will born as human to end this era.
N said
This book should be widely available in all major book stores in India, like LANDMARK etc. Is there a possibility that the book will be available on line for download, by donation of course, well worth the effort to do this so it reaches a vast audience.
Thanks
anil said
Here are some quotes on sexual harassment
“Men consider that sexual harassment is most often a result of human nature, while women mainly view it as a misuse of a superior position at work.”
“That dress/shirt looks really nice on you,” one employee says to another. If uttered in the wrong way, to the wrong person, at the wrong time, such a simple statement can lead to a flood of sexual harassment complaints and potential legal battles for the employees and employers involved”
“Even human resource professionals–the ones in charge of defining their corporate cultures–have differing opinions about the seriousness of this issue”
“As a result, awareness may be at an all-time high, but so is confusion about what this means in the workplace. Despite numerous well-meaning efforts by employers, sexual harassment litigation continues to skyrocket”
Even human resource professionals–the ones in charge of defining their corporate cultures–have differing opinions about the seriousness of this issue. Some cited sexual harassment as a “real problem,” while others maintained that it is the ‘victims’ subjective perception”
“When it comes to matters concerning sexual harassment, ambiguity continues to dominate public opinion and policies in the private sector”
Rajesh said
Great book. A must read for all people who are about to marry.
Specially for the male chauvanistic pigs who say they will support these gender biased laws because they think women are oppressed, weak etc. They do not believe in equality. I support equality of women and want equal representation of women in all fields starting from parliament.
Thanks,
Rajesh
anil said
Whatever shit happens, insensitive dowry laws and the domestic violence act will be abolished or modified in the future. Take my word for it.
anil said
Women’s English
—————————
Yes = No
No = Yes
Maybe = No
I’m sorry. = You’ll be sorry.
We need = I want
It’s your decision = The correct decision should be obvious by now.
Do what you want = You’ll pay for this later.
We need to talk = I need to complain
Sure… go ahead = I don’t want you to.
I’m not upset = Of course I’m upset, you moron!
You’re certainly attentive tonight = Is sex all you ever think about?
This kitchen is so inconvenient = I want a new house.
I want new curtains = and carpeting, and furniture, and wallpaper…..
Hang the picture there = NO, I mean hang it there!
I heard a noise = I noticed you were almost asleep.
Do you love me? = I’m going to ask for something expensive.
How much do you love me? = I did something today you’re really not going to like.
I’ll be ready in a minute. = Kick off your shoes and find a good game on T.V.
Is my butt fat? = Tell me I’m beautiful.
You have to learn to communicate. = Just agree with me.
Are you listening to me!? = [Too late, you're dead.]
Was that the baby?=Why don’t you get out of bed and walk him until he goes to sleep.
I’m not yelling! = Yes I am yelling because I think this is important.
anil said
There are some media channels and papers which do their best to be objective. There are others which try to blast only one gender, after all a story wouldnot not sell that well if both genders were the offenders. Lastly , there are those channel/channels, which have positioned themselves as the saviours of one particular gender(good marketing sense), but biased neverthless. I guess we know who.
There were much publicized atrocities against the foriegn female tourists in pushkar(three rapes in a month in Rajasthan). Well , is it not true. In one case, the woman took back the complaint. In the second case, was it not found that there was a another man present in the room(friend of the “victim”) when the alleged rape took place bv another man.
Some sections of the media had a field day in highlighting these episodes. Will these scumbags go back to these cases or have they conveniently forgotten them.
anil said
if one gender is sensitive towards the other.it can expect the same
anil said
A man was convicted to 5 years in prison by a trial court for the rape of his daughter based on her testimony and no corraborating evidence(It is difficult to get corraborating evidence in these cases).And so the supreme court has held that the testimony of the “victim” may be enough to send a man behind bars.
Later on, this was upgraded to life imprisonment by the apex court.
Now, the daughter says that that she made the allegation against her father only because of coercion by her mother, The SC disbelieved these statements of the daughter stating that they believed her previous account where she had claimed that her father her raped her.
The court also dismissed the fathers (Asha Ram’s)petition for review of the case.
anil said
Report on Newyork Times
In April, Jerry Miller, an Illinois man who served 24 years for a rape he did not commit, became the 200th American prisoner cleared by DNA evidence. His case, like the 199 others, represented a catastrophic failure of the criminal justice system.
When an airplane crashes, investigators pore over the wreckage to discover what went wrong and to learn from the experience. The justice system has not done anything similar.
But a new study does. Brandon L. Garrett, a law professor at the University of Virginia, has, for the first time, systematically examined the 200 cases, in which innocent people served an average of 12 years in prison. In each case, of course, the evidence used to convict them was at least flawed and often false — yet juries, trial judges and appellate courts failed to notice.
“A few types of unreliable trial evidence predictably supported wrongful convictions,” Professor Garrett concluded in his study, “Judging Innocence,” to be published in The Columbia Law Review in January.
The leading cause of the wrongful convictions was erroneous identification by eyewitnesses, which occurred 79 percent of the time. In a quarter of the cases, such testimony was the only direct evidence against the defendant.
Faulty forensic evidence was next, present in 55 percent of the cases. In some of those cases, courts put undue weight on evidence with limited value, as when a defendant’s blood type matched evidence from the crime scene. In others, prosecution experts exaggerated, made honest mistakes or committed outright fraud.
Most of the forensic evidence involved problems with the analysis of blood or semen. Forty-two cases featured expert testimony about hair, an area that is, Professor Garrett wrote, “notoriously unreliable.”
Informants testified against the defendants in 18 percent of the cases. (In three cases, it turned out they had an unusually powerful motive for their false testimony, as DNA evidence proved they were in fact guilty of the crime they had pinned on the defendant.)
There were false confessions in 16 percent of the cases, with two-thirds of those involving defendants who were juveniles, mentally retarded or both.
The 200 cases examined in the study are a distinctive subset of criminal cases. More than 90 percent of those exonerated by DNA were convicted of rape, or of both rape and murder, rape being the classic crime in which DNA can categorically prove innocence. For other crimes, there is often no biological evidence or, if there is, it can give only circumstantial hints about guilt or innocence.
Only 14 of those exonerated had been sentenced to death, 13 in rape-murders. There is a widespread misconception that DNA evidence has freed many inmates from death row, but it is actually a rare murder not involving rape in which biological evidence can provide categorical proof of innocence.
“DNA testing is available in fewer than 10 percent of violent crimes,” said Peter Neufeld, a founder of the Innocence Project at Cardozo Law School, which was instrumental in securing many exonerations. “But the same causes of wrongful convictions exist in cases with DNA evidence as in those cases that don’t.”
Professor Garrett’s study strongly suggests, then, that there are thousands of people serving long sentences for crimes they did not commit but who have no hope that DNA can clear them.
In a second forthcoming study of false convictions, this one focused on capital cases, two law professors —Samuel R. Gross of the University of Michigan and Barbara O’Brien of Michigan State —cautioned that “exonerations are highly unrepresentative of wrongful convictions in general.”
“The main thing we can safely conclude from exonerations is that there are many other false convictions that we have not discovered,” the Michigan study said. “In addition, a couple of strong demographic patterns appear to be reliable: black men accused of raping white women face a greater risk of false conviction than other rape defendants; and young suspects, those under 18, are at greater risk of false confession than other suspects.” Professor Garrett also found that exonerated convicts were more apt to be members of minority groups than was the prison population generally. For instance, 73 percent of the convicts cleared of rape charges were black or Hispanic, compared with 37 percent of all rape convicts.
The courts performed miserably in ferreting out the innocent. Thirty-one of the 200 exonerated prisoners, for instance, had appealed to the United States Supreme Court, but the justices refused to hear 30 of the cases. In the one case they did hear, they ruled against the inmate. Of course, appeals courts do not typically reconsider a jury’s factual findings, focusing instead on asserted procedural errors. Only 20 of the 200 even appealed on the ground that they were innocent; none of those claims were granted.
Perhaps the most troubling finding in Professor Garrett’s study was how reluctant the criminal justice system was to allow DNA testing in the first place. Prosecutors often opposed it, and 16 courts initially denied requests for testing.
.
In 40 percent of the cases handled by the Innocence Project, Mr. Neufeld said, DNA not only exonerated the innocent prisoner but also provided evidence that helped identify the person who committed the crime. “In every single one of those cases that perpetrator had committed violent crimes in the intervening years,” he said.
anil said
As per a study
“With the cooperation of the police agency of a small metropolitan community, 45 consecutive, disposed, false rape allegations covering a 9 year period were studied. False rape allegations constitute 41% of the total forcible rape cases (109) reported during this period. These false allegations appear to serve three major functions for the complainants: providing an alibi, seeking revenge, and obtaining sympathy and attention. False rape allegations are not the consequence of a gender-linked aberration, as frequently claimed, but reflect impulsive and desperate efforts to cope with personal and social stress situations. [False rape allegations are reported in similar numbers at college campuses; approximately 50% of rape charges are admitted to be false by the accuser."]
Anon said
The book can be downloaded freely from here:
http://ipc498a.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/a-guide-to-surviving-ipc498a-v10.pdf
anil said
sorry to say this guys, (use the delete button if necessary), how is it that a channel which has continoiuusly berated men .in subtle or not so subtle ways, suddenly found itself in partnership with siff? In fact I can think of a paper which has been much more objective.
//Author of above survival guide, was before SIFF, GHRS took all posting without his Permission.
anil said
two points here.
Ndtv has always followed congress dictats. A mutual give and take relationship. Congress is now firmly into feminist agenda.
Secondly, ndtv has long positioned itself into a feminist marketing strategy.
Hence, in this scenario, I do hope SIFF rtealizes what it is doing.
resma said
I wish to open my coment in this matter
Sabapathy said
NOWADAYS men are tortured in the hands of women by misusing newly formulated laws specially designed only for women. The law makers fully forgetting the constitutions article 14 which says all men and woman are equal before law or say equality before law. This article 14 giving equal strength to man and woman but formulating new law for women so for no law formulated by the law makers for men. Why?
A fine case of one Mr. Rathinasabapathy who was married with Rajeswari of Howrah at Pondicherry on 4th June 2003 started their life initially at Pondicherry latter after five months shifted to Bangalore where he was employed. The husband arranged job for his wife and he had given her all possible freedom which include to visit her parental house, to wear the dresses she feel convenient. But his all these freedoms and love showered towards the wife resulted in one fine day with hand cuffs of iron. Do you believe? YES THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The husband who once tried his best to keep his wife happy meted the cruelty by the same women. The husband arranged all physical mental pleasures for his wife but not fulfilled one demand which is affecting his parents, unmarried brother and sister. The wife demand for separate dwelling that too in such a place the language of which is a strange thing to the husband and leaving the old aged sick parents here all alone was not welcomed by the husband and which only resulted in iron hand cuffing like a herded criminal and lying in illegal custody for eight days.
The wife and her parents even not intimated him the child birth and somehow when he come to know the child birth he requested to send a snap of the child which was also not heard. For the new born the father send some gift which was also returned by the wife and her parents. Their cruelty reached at Himalayan peak when she lodged a complaint using the weapon of dowry and domestic violence act (DVA) and several other criminal section against husband and in-laws, the in-laws who never interfered her life. The question is if she really met cruelty by the hands of husband and his relatives why she had not opted to file a complaint in the jurisdiction police station which was only in walkable distance. She opted to file complaint in the Howrah police station and filed a divorce under section 13a and succeeded to get an expartee decree within 3 months of filing which is very impossible as per marriage law. The husband had not given time to file counter or for a counselling. When husband was attending for maintenance case and came out of the court he was arrested and handcuffed and remained in the custody for eight days and ninth day presented before the judicial magistrate and then kept one day in judicial custody and latter bailed out. The wife atlest shown curtsy by not opposing the anticipatory bail of in-laws.
The women how she forget the sweetness of togetherness, how she forget the sweet face of her husband which is now also in front of her in the form of child.
THE MEN WAS CRUSHED IN THE HANDS OF WOMEN. The men who is a M.Sc., M.Phil., earning sufficiently was now staring the sky with no hope for justice. His parents are weeping and sister, brother still in a stage of shock.
The reward paid by the wife to her husband is the only result of misusing of newly formulated laws. The court at Howrah which have no jurisdiction neither to try the suit for divorce nor for the criminal offence as the couple married at Pondicherry and last resided place at Bangalore, where both of them were employed and as such alleged offence held in Bangalore. So the decree which is passed by the Howrah Court is improper and the complaint also liable to be quashed. But these all will happen in future.
Wake and do something for men otherwise similar trouble tomorrow you also have to face. For this not only togetherness of men required but the togetherness of women also required.
Thanks,
M. Rathina Sabapathy
Pondicherry
09894669932