| Ahmed on I Do not want Dowry.? | |
| pawan on Gigolos say married women look… | |
| Gaurav on Lawyers U Can Trust. | |
| Gaurav on Lawyers U Can Trust. | |
| Angryman on House wife slept with 18 yr ol… | |
| durga on More women now raise voice aga… | |
| sunny on ::..BAD Lawyers List..:: | |
| pawan said on Gigolos say married women look… | |
| satya on Lawyers U Can Trust. | |
| Rani on Lawyers U Can Trust. | |
| Rakesh Patel on Gigolos say married women look… | |
| Nikhil M. Pujari on Letter to President of India … | |
| Raj on Gigolos say married women look… | |
| ravikumar on Gigolos say married women look… | |
| RANJAN on Supreme Court gives legal tag … |
Posted by 498A_Crusader on February 11, 2008
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
This entry was posted on February 11, 2008 at 9:43 am and is filed under 498a, Articles, News, biased laws, domestic violence in india, dowry, dvact, feminism, gender biased laws, india, law misuse, men, men`s rights, mynation.net, save indian family, save indian society, sexual harassment, society, women. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Swarup Sarkar said
Crime against women is 8.8% , that means 92.2% crime against men as per crime bure report, but still no men wellfare minsitry in this coutry ..why?
Does crime against men called , social service in india ?
Now the real review of the data and see how the Crime bure want to fool the people and do not publish the real data and hide the truth.
Crime Bure data, 2005 All India: Did You Know?
In the Year 2005, the Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four Thousands ( 92.88%) vs One Lack fifty-five thousands against women( 6.38%)?
http://ncrb.nic.in/crime2005/cii-2005/Table%201.1.pdf
Comp. Sue Moto By Police(FIR Registered): 24,37,973/-
Crime Against Women : 1,55,553/-
Crime against Child : 17,975/-
Crime against Men : 22 ,64 , 445/-
In the Year 2005 the Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four Thousands vs One Lack fifty-five thousands against women?
% Wise All India Crime Against Men, Woemn and Child as Under :
Crime Against Women : 6.38%
Crime Against Child : 0.73%
Crime Against Men : 92.88%
We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?
——————————————————————————–
Data of Crime Bure 2006 498A and 304B:
Data of Crime Bure 2006 498A and 304B:
No. of Person Arrested under (498A +304B) : 161217
Child/Senior citizen/Women arrested :280/4700/31253
No. Of person Arrested Under 304B : 24562
No. of Person Arrested Only under 498A (living women) : 137180
No. Of person Not Charge sheeted : 31128
No. Of person Charge Sheeted : 125277
No. Of person’s Trial Completed : 78292
No. Of person convicted (498A+304B) : 16995
No. Of Person Convicted by 304B : 5144
No. Of person Convicted Under 498A but not 304B : NA?
No. Of person Proved Innocence at Court under 498A : 61297
No. Person’s case compunded or withdrawn : 13970
No. Of person Convicted only under 498A without 304B : NA ?
On an average (3+19.3) = 22.3% people’s case (4812+31128) =35,940/- had not been even charge sheeted and proved innocence before trail.
It is a clear example that approx 80% cases people proved their innocence at Court that they had been arrested without any reason/evidence as 498A/304B is non-bailable and do not need any evidence to arrest any TOM/Dick or Marry .
So, it is a clear example that more than 92.3% cases the people had been arrested under 498A without any evidence, where as if the case is true and the verbal statement of the compliment itself find true, the convection is 100%.
Still in this special LAW more than 92.3% People proved their innocence, where as in normal IPC the convection is more than such LAW, then why need this special LAW?
The Answer : To do the Legal Terrorism and earn the money from Husband’s Family as a whole sale free license and openly Blackmail and do the extortion of money by Wives family in front of Police/Court/Media and the same is not to be termed as crime.
We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?
To understand the reason one must Know: Women “Engineering viewpoint”
Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?
2006 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:55452 vs. Married Women Sucide:29.869
Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry Death) and 498A ( harrasement to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harrasement by wife)
Dr A S Sreedhar said
1. Since it is expected, there is no wonder to know why there is a steep rise in crime against men in 2006 too. As long as men hide themselves with a false social stigma, this will continue. A few women could force the law to come in action, which opened doors to many to mis-use. When I checked out the PIL against 498A, I found ..hardly.. people sign in there. Each state statistics shows lakhs of men being victimized under this draconian law, thousands are calling us through helpline numbers, not even tens and twenties dare to come forward to rise their voice.
2. suprisingly the case number increased year by year but the trial/convition rate remained same from last year. What is happeneing to those extra cases? and cases registered? before trial they are solved through B-report (no case is made out as per police), mistake of fact (MF), or further action dropped (FAD) by Honourable Magistrate. Most of the cases were/are solved by compromise (heavy laden on men with financial committment).
3. when the legal system fail to protect men, when more and more men are committing suicide, when scientists ready to create sperm from women embryo cells..what if these effects make males extinct..how it affects the society?
who cares whether men exists or extinct?
Leema said
http://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/08/stories/2008080855190500.htm
The Madras High Court Bench here has directed the State government to appoint Protection Officers in every district as stipulated under Section 11 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Disposing of a public interest litigation petition, a Division Bench comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice M. Venugopal directed the Chief Secretary to create awareness of the enactment among women and sensitise the officers involved in the process at regular intervals. The official was also ordered to set up a mechanism to periodically review the progress of the awareness and sensitisation programmes, besides taking stock of the overall situation in the State. Such a mechanism shall provide guidance to all concerned in order to uphold the objects of the Act.
Speaking for the Bench, Mr. Justice Rao said:[b] “The knight in shining armour for the Indian Woman has arrived in the form of this Act aimed at providing relief to millions of women affected by violence in their homes, which is of the gravest and most pervasive of human right violations in India.”
The enactment of this legislation was an expression of concern by the legislature at the escalation of violence against women. But, unless the implementing agencies (State governments) act in all promptness, the objects of the enactment could not be achieved, the Judge observed.
First we need to educate this kind of Judge about the statistics report published by NCRB